International Journal of Advanced Engineering Application

RANS CFD Simulation, Experimental Validation and Flow Control of Low-Speed NACA 2412 Aerofoil with Vortex Generators for Stall Delay in UAV Applications

Author(s):Dr. Sophia Müller, Johannes Braun

Affiliation: Institute of Aerodynamics and Gas Dynamics, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

Page No: 39-42

Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 3, Issue 4, 2026/04/07

Journal: International Journal of Advanced Engineering Application (IJAEA)

ISSN NO: 3048-6807

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19478827

Download PDF Cite this article

Article Indexing:

Abstract:
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) operating at low Reynolds numbers (Re 10⁵–10⁶) encounter aerodynamic challenges distinct from those of large manned aircraft — particularly the formation of laminar separation bubbles on the upper aerofoil surface at moderate angles of attack that precipitate abrupt stall with minimal pre-stall warning, threatening mission continuity and airframe safety. The NACA 2412 aerofoil, widely adopted for small UAV and agricultural drone wing sections due to its well-documented thickness and camber characteristics, exhibits stall at approximately 15° under clean surface conditions at Re 3×10⁵ — a stall angle insufficient for the high-angle manoeuvres required in precision agricultural spray operations and urban air mobility corridors. This paper presents a comprehensive CFD simulation study using RANS k-ω SST and DDES turbulence models in Ansys FLUENT 2023 R2, validated against wind tunnel measurements in the IIT Kanpur 1.4m×1.0m low-turbulence (Tu=0.04%) tunnel across α=−4° to 20°, for the clean NACA 2412 and three vortex generator (VG) configurations — triangular delta, counter-rotating rectangular, and co-rotating asymmetric arrays at 5% chord station. Lift and drag coefficients, Cp distribution, and boundary layer velocity profiles from hot-wire anemometry constitute the validation dataset. The counter-rotating VG array achieves CLmax extension to 1.62 (+9.5% over clean baseline) and stall angle delay to 18° (+3°). Grid convergence, turbulence model sensitivity, and drag breakdown analysis are systematically presented.

Keywords: NACA 2412, CFD, RANS, k-ω SST, DDES, vortex generator, stall delay, UAV, aerodynamics, Cp distribution, lift-drag polar, wind tunnel

Reference:

• [1] Anderson, J. D. (2017). Fundamentals of Aerodynamics (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• [2] Braun, J., & Müller, S. (2022). DDES simulation of laminar separation bubbles on UAV aerofoils. Aerospace Science and Technology, 122, 107408.
• [3] Gad-el-Hak, M. (2000). Flow Control: Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management. Cambridge University Press.
• [4] Lin, J. C. (2002). Review of research on low-profile vortex generators. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38(4-5), 389-420.
• [5] Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32(8), 1598-1605.
• [6] Mueller, T. J. (Ed.). (2001). Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications. AIAA Progress in Astronautics.
• [7] Narayanan, R., & Venkatesh, A. (2023). Vortex generator optimisation for agricultural UAV wings. Journal of Aerospace Engineering (ASCE), 36(4), 04023018.
• [8] Selig, M. S., et al. (1995). Summary of Low-Speed Airfoil Data, Vol. 1. SoarTech Publications.
• [9] Spalart, P. R. (2009). Detached-eddy simulation. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 41, 181-202.
• [10] Tani, I. (1964). Low-speed flows involving bubble separations. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 5, 70-103.