International Journal of Advanced Engineering Application

Influence of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag on Strength, Durability and Microstructure of M30 Grade Concrete

Author(s):Suresh Babu Patel, Kavitha Rajan, Mohammed Imran Khan

Affiliation: Department of Civil Engineering, Visvesvaraya College of Engineering and Technology, Bhopal, India

Page No: 40-47

Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 3, Issue 5, May 2026

Journal: International Journal of Advanced Engineering Application (IJAEA)

ISSN NO: 3048-6807

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20109726

Download PDF Cite this article

Abstract:
Ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), a latent hydraulic binder produced as a by-product of iron manufacturing, has been identified as one of the most effective supplementary cementitious materials for improving the long-term strength and durability of Portland cement concrete. This study presents a systematic experimental investigation into the effect of GGBS as a partial replacement of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) at five replacement levels — 0%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% by weight of binder — on M30 grade concrete. Properties evaluated include fresh concrete workability (slump and compacting factor), compressive strength at 28, 56, and 90 days, flexural and split tensile strength at 28 days, water absorption, rapid chloride permeability (RCPT per ASTM C1202), sorptivity, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) microstructural analysis at 28 days. Results demonstrate that 30% GGBS replacement achieves the optimal balance of mechanical and durability performance, with 28-day compressive strength of 25.9 MPa, 90-day strength of 34.1 MPa (16.4% above control), flexural strength of 4.5 MPa, RCPT charge of 820 Coulombs (41.8% below control), and water absorption of 3.5% (27.1% below control). Higher replacement levels (40–50%) show progressive strength reduction at 28 days attributable to the slower hydraulic activation kinetics of GGBS relative to OPC, but maintain competitive long-term performance due to continued latent hydraulic and pozzolanic activity. SEM analysis at 28 days confirms denser C-S-H gel formation and refined pore structure at the interfacial transition zone in GGBS-modified mixes. The 30% GGBS mix achieves an estimated 24% reduction in embodied CO₂ relative to the OPC control, demonstrating significant environmental co-benefit alongside structural performance improvement

Keywords: GGBS, ground granulated blast furnace slag, M30 concrete, compressive strength, durability, chloride permeability, sorptivity, SEM microstructure, supplementary cementitious material, embodied carbon

Reference:

• [1] Bureau of Indian Standards (1987). IS 12089:1987 – Specification for Granulated Slag for Manufacture of Portland Slag Cement. BIS, New Delhi.
• [2] Bureau of Indian Standards (2013). IS 12269:2013 – Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement. BIS, New Delhi.
• [3] Bureau of Indian Standards (2016). IS 383:2016 – Coarse and Fine Aggregate for Concrete – Specification. BIS, New Delhi.
• [4] Bureau of Indian Standards (2019). IS 10262:2019 – Concrete Mix Proportioning – Guidelines. BIS, New Delhi.
• [5] Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of Concrete, 5th Edition. Pearson Education, Harlow, UK.
• [6] Pal, S. C., Mukherjee, A., & Pathak, S. R. (2003). Investigation of hydraulic activity of ground granulated blast furnace slag in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(9), 1481–1486.
• [7] Barnett, S. J., Soutsos, M. N., Millard, S. G., & Bungey, J. H. (2006). Strength development of mortars containing ground granulated blast-furnace slag. Cement and Concrete Research, 36(3), 434–440.
• [8] Lothenbach, B., Scrivener, K., & Hooton, R. D. (2011). Supplementary cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 41(12), 1244–1256.
• [9] Shariq, M., Prasad, J., & Ahuja, A. K. (2008). Strength development of cement mortar and concrete incorporating GGBFS. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 9(1), 61–74.
• [10] Richardson, I. G. (2000). The nature of C-S-H in hardened cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(8), 1131–1147.
• [11] Dubey, R., & Kumar, P. (2012). Effect of water–binder ratio and GGBS replacement on compressive strength and durability of high performance concrete. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 3(1), 141–153.
• [12] Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• [13] ASTM International (2019). ASTM C1202 – Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration. ASTM, West Conshohocken.
• [14] ASTM International (2013). ASTM C1585 – Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes. ASTM, West Conshohocken.